Thursday, June 28, 2007

Armies must ready for global warming role: Britain

Mon Jun 25, 2007 3:23PM EDT
REUTERS

By Jeremy Lovell




LONDON (Reuters) - Global warming is such a threat to security that
military planners must build it into their calculations, the head of
Britain's armed forces said on Monday.




Jock Stirrup, chief of the defense staff, said risks that climate
change could cause weakened states to disintegrate and produce major
humanitarian disasters or exploitation by armed groups had to become a
feature of military planning.




But he said first analyses showed planners would not have to switch
their geographical focus, because the areas most vulnerable to climate
change are those where security risks are already high.




"Just glance at a map of the areas most likely to be affected and
you are struck at once by the fact that they are exactly those parts of
the world where we see fragility, instability and weak governance today.




"It seems to me rather like pouring petrol onto a burning fire," Stirrup told the Chatham House think-tank in London.




British Foreign Secretary Margaret Beckett chaired the first debate
on climate change at the U.N. Security Council in April this year. She
argued that the potential for climate change to cause wars meant it
should be on the council's radar.




Stirrup said the unpredictability of the immediate effects of global
warming on rainfall patterns and storms meant flashpoints could be
advanced by years without warning.




He did not identify the problem areas, but Bert Metz of the U.N.'s
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change told the meeting they
included Central America, the Amazon Basin, large parts of north,
central and southern Africa and swathes of Asia.




Scientists say average temperatures will rise by between 1.8 and 4.0
degrees Celsius this century due to burning fossil fuels for power and
transport, melting ice caps, bringing floods, droughts and famines, and
putting millions of lives at risk.

Stirrup said the security threat was far more immediate than those figures might suggest.




"If temperatures rise towards the upper end of the forecast range we
could already start to see serious physical consequences by 2040 -- and
that is if things get no worse."




"If things do get worse you don't need to come very much forward
from 2040 before, in my terms at least, you are talking about the day
after tomorrow," Stirrup said.




He said the September 11, 2001 attacks on New York and Washington
showed the devastation that attacks fuelled by political, economic and
social deprivation could achieve.




"Now add in the effects of climate change. Poverty and despair
multiply, resentment surges and people look for someone to blame," he
said.




Even if the world agreed quickly on a way of equitably tackling the
climate crisis -- which was far from sure -- the nature of the problem
meant a significant degree of adverse change was already in the
pipeline.




"That rapidity, alongside the size of the global population and the
complexity of today's society, leaves us particularly vulnerable,"
Stirrup said. "It is bound to present substantial security challenges
of one kind or another."




Asked on the margins of the meeting if that meant military planners
should opt for preemptive action where they saw a security crisis
emerging, he said: "Only in the sense of building governance.
Recognizing the problem is the first step."




Powered by ScribeFire.

Saturday, June 23, 2007

'Mile-wide UFO' spotted by British airline pilot


ThisIslondon.co.uk

One of the largest UFOs ever seen has been observed by the crew and passengers of an airliner over the Channel Islands.

An official air-miss report on the incident several weeks ago appears in Pilot magazine.

Aurigny Airlines captain Ray Bowyer, 50, flying close to Alderney first spotted
the object, described as "a cigar-shaped brilliant white light".

Aurigny Airlines captain Ray Bowyer, 50, described what he thought to be a UFO
as 'a cigar-shaped brilliant white light', similar to the image
supplied by Dennis Plunket of the British Flying Saucer bureau

As the plane got closer the captain viewed it through binoculars and said:
"It was a very sharp, thin yellow object with a green area.

"It was 2,000ft up and stationary. I thought it was about 10 miles away,
although I later realised it was approximately 40 miles from us. At
first, I thought it was the size of a [Boeing] 737.

"But it must have been much bigger because of how far away it was. It could have been as much as a mile wide."

Continuing his approach to Guernsey, Bowyer then spied a "second identical object further to the west".

He said: "It was exactly the same but looked smaller because it was
further away. It was closer to Guernsey. I can't explain it. This was
clearly visual for about nine minutes.

"I'm certainly not saying that it was something of another world. All I'm saying is that I have
never seen anything like it before in all my years of flying."

The sightings were confirmed by passengers Kate and John Russell. John, 74,
said: "I saw an orange light. It was like an elongated oval."

The sightings were also confirmed by an unnamed pilot with the Blue Islands airline.

The Civil Aviation Authority safety notice states that a Tri-Lander aircraft flying close to Alderney spotted the object.

"Certain parts of the report have not been published. I cannot say why," said a senior CAA source.

Earlier this year, however, the MOD declared its intentions to open its UFO files to the public.





Powered by ScribeFire.

Thursday, June 21, 2007

Vice President Exempts His Office from the Requirements for Protecting Classified Information

Thursday, June 21, 2007

Administration Oversight



The Oversight Committee has learned that over the objections of the
National Archives, Vice President Cheney exempted his office from the
presidential order that establishes government-wide procedures for
safeguarding classified national security information. The Vice
President asserts that his office is not an “entity within the
executive branch.”




As described in a letter from Chairman Waxman to the Vice
President, the National Archives protested the Vice President's
position in letters written in June 2006 and August 2006. When these
letters were ignored, the National Archives wrote to Attorney General
Alberto Gonzales in January 2007 to seek a resolution of the impasse.
The Vice President's staff responded by seeking to abolish the agency
within the Archives that is responsible for implementing the
President's executive order.




In his letter to the Vice President, Chairman Waxman writes:
"I question both the legality and wisdom of your actions. ... [I]t
would appear particularly irresponsible to give an office with your
history of security breaches an exemption from the safeguards that
apply to all other executive branch officials."




A fact sheet prepared by Chairman Waxman describes other
instances in which the Vice President's office has sought to avoid
oversight and accountability.




Powered by ScribeFire.

Wednesday, June 20, 2007

'Earth Mother getting angry'

American Indians fight climate change

The Associated Press

June 18. 2007 8:00AM



From New Hampshire to California, American Indian leaders are speaking out more forcefully about the danger of climate change.



Members of six tribes recently gathered near the Baker River in the White Mountains for a sacred ceremony honoring "Earth Mother." Talking Hawk, a Mohawk Indian who asked to be identified by his Indian name, pointed to the river's tea-colored water as proof that the overwhelming amount of pollution humans have produced has caused changes around the globe.



"It's August color. It's not normal," he said.



"Earth Mother is fighting back - not only from the four winds, but also from underneath," he said. "Scientists call it global warming. We call it Earth Mother getting angry."



At a United Nations meeting last month, several American Indian leaders spoke at a session called "Indigenous Perspectives on Climate Change." Also in May, tribal representatives from Alaska and northern Canada - where pack ice has vanished earlier and earlier each spring - traveled to Washington to press their case.



Powered by ScribeFire.

Saturday, June 16, 2007

Things Your Media Momma Didn't Tell You

Friday, June 15, 2007

FMNM

Free-Market News Network, Corp.








The fact that most Americans oppose the war in Iraq, and want the
president impeached, is testimony to the native intelligence and common
sense of the citizens of this nation.



It sure isn't thanks to the quality of the news we're getting here in America.!



Here are some of the things you don't know if you just depend on the corporate media for your information:



  1. Most Americans would like to see this
    president and vice president impeached and removed from office.
    Newsweek magazine published a scientific poll last October showing that
    51 percent of us favor impeachment (including 29 percent of
    Republicans!), but the corporate media, which normally hasn't met a
    poll it won't publish, didn't publicize this one. And now, when the
    numbers supporting impeachment are surely even higher, you can't even
    pay a polling outfit to ask the question. No wonder most people who
    favor impeachment still think they're odd ducks.
  2. There is a bill, filed in the House of Representatives on
    April 24 by Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-OH), calling for the impeachment of
    Vice President Cheney. Since it was filed, it has gained six
    co-sponsors, including a member of the House Democratic leadership,
    Rep. Janice Shakowsky (D-IL). Most major media have ignored this
    important story completely. Most Americans also don't know that the
    Vermont State Senate voted overwhelmingly this spring to call on
    Congress to impeach the president.
  3. The president has been declared a felon in federal court.
    Yet even after Federal District Judge Anna Diggs Taylor ruled last
    August that President Bush and the National Security Agency were
    committing serial Class A felonies and were violating both the First
    and Fourth Amendments by spying on Americans' communications without
    first obtaining warrants, Bush continued ordering the NSA to continue
    the patently illegal program for at least half a year. In reports on
    the spying program, the corporate media never mention that it has been
    declared a felonious activity by the federal court.
  4. Fifteen Democratic Party state organizations have passed
    impeachment resolutions calling on Democrats in Congress to initiate
    impeachment proceedings against the president and vice president. The
    most recent of these, the Democratic Party of Oklahoma, passed its
    resolution at the party's annual convention on May 19. Other Democratic
    Party conventions, in states from Nevada and California to
    Massachusetts and North Carolina, have passed similar resolutions. Most
    have been ignored by the corporate media even in their own states.
  5. Bush's so-called "coalition of the willing" is not so
    willing and is not really much of a coalition either. When's the last
    time you've heard how many countries are on board with the US in the
    war and occupation of Iraq? The reality? Britain, the only significant
    contributor of combat troops besides the U.S., is pulling out, as did
    Italy and Spain, and many other countries, like Denmark, Lithuania and
    others, plan to be out of Iraq by August or at the latest December. One
    indication of the seriousness of situation: The Pentagon no longer
    lists the countries that are members of the "coalition." The only
    mainstream report I've seen laying this out this collapse in
    international support for Bush's war was in USA Today last February.
  6. The Homeland Security Department last year awarded
    Halliburton $385 million in a no-bid contract to construct prison camps
    designed to hold tens of thousands of unspecified prisoners in the
    event of domestic unrest. Meanwhile, President Bush has signed a bill
    altering the insurrection act so that he can declare martial rule and
    order active duty troops to take charge anywhere in the domestic US in
    the event of "public disorder." No one in the corporate media has
    reported on these developments or asked the White House to explain what
    it's all about.
  7. There is evidence that Cheney, as CEO of Halliburton, was a
    patron of the Washington Madam whose client book of high-class
    call-girls is causing many in Washington political circles-mostly
    Republicans it appears, who apparently need to pay for their sex-to
    sweat. So far no mention of the Cheney angle in the corporate media,
    though they've been having fun with the broader story of a political
    sex scandal. No mention either of how a brave West Point cadet refused
    to shake Cheney's hand on stage when the vice president was handing out
    this year's diplomas at the Army's premiere academy.
  8. Among the "worst of the worst" of the "evildoers" captured
    and held as "enemy combatants" at Guantanamo were children, some of
    them preteens and kids who were under 15 when captured and brought to
    Cuba-so many in fact that the military had to set up a special
    facility, called Camp Iguana, just for adolescent and pre-pubescent
    "fighters." The corporate media have barely reported on this atrocity
    (the New York Times ran only one article mentioning child captives, in
    June 2005). The only wider coverage of this outrage came recently when
    the government tried to prosecute one such alleged child
    "terrorist"-Omar Khadr-only to have the military judge in charge toss
    his case out because the government had misclassified him. Khadr, we
    learned, was captured in 2001 in Afghanistan at the ripe age of 15,
    making him one of the older child captives brought to and interrogated
    at Guantanamo. Under international law, the U.S. was supposed to treat
    this and other child soldiers as victims, not as war criminals. Khadr,
    a Canadian by birth, instead has spent five years doing hard time in US
    captivity.
  9. Well-researched reports on the rampant theft of both the
    2000 and 2004 elections, and on Republican plans for theft of the 2008
    election, such as Mark Crispin Miller's Fooled Again, have gone
    unmentioned in the corporate media. Books on the subject, like Miller's
    and like Greg Palast's best selling Armed Madhouse, have never been
    reviewed.
  10. And of course, there's my own book. The Case for
    Impeachment, despite its having sold over 20,000 copies in hardcover,
    and despite its having now come out in a mass-market paperback edition,
    in both cases printed by a mainstream publisher, St. Martin's Press,
    has not received a single review in the corporate media. In this, my
    co-author Barbara Olshansky and I are not alone. None of the books on
    the impeachable crimes of this administration, including one by
    Nixon-era impeachment panelist and former congresswoman Elizabeth
    Holtzman, and one by Judiciary Chair Rep. John Conyers, has been
    reviewed by a mainstream media outlet.


What we're talking about here is a media blackout of important stories and news.



Thanks to the internet and to the grapevine, and thanks to their
basic native intelligence, most Americans seem to understand that we're
being lied to and cheated. What the media blackout of important news
does manage to do, however, is keep us all thinking that we are in a
minority in opposing things like illegal wars, a trampled Constitution,
and stolen elections.



In fact, however, we're actually the majority.



Once we realize this, maybe we will have a movement, instead of a just nation of isolated cynics and complainers.





Powered by ScribeFire.

Native hum

As honeybees vanish, farmers turn to the wild pollinators in their back yards


In 1940, alfalfa-seed farmers in the desert of central Utah made an
interesting discovery: The primary pollinator of their crop was not the
honeybee, but the alkali bees that nested in the region’s salt flats.
For all its status as the workhorse of American agriculture, the
European honeybee didn’t really like foraging in alfalfa. But alkali
bees loved it, pollinating some 5,500 flowers daily. Farmers lucky
enough to live next to them were raising three times more alfalfa seed
per acre than those who didn’t.


From Utah to Washington state, farmers started transplanting thousands
of cubic feet of soil with alkali bee nests to aid in the production of
alfalfa seed — a hugely important crop because the alfalfa grown in
hayfields produces almost no seed on its own. The largest managed
alkali bee nesting bed is now five acres in size and is home to more
than 5 million bees.


“It gives me conniptions, it’s so big,” says Jim Cane, an entomologist
at the U.S. Department of Agriculture Bee Biology and Systematics
Laboratory in Logan, Utah. “It’s just roaring with bees. The ground is
shimmering for several acres.” Cane says these farmers harvest at least
20 percent more seed than needed to break even.


The humble alkali bee had turned the attention of a whole sector of
commercial farmers away from the European honeybee. It was the first
time this had happened. It would not be the last.


While honeybees spent thousands of years honestly earning their
place in our hearts with their honey production, easily manipulated
colonies, generalist pollinating tendencies and heroic work ethic,
their wild cousins lived in obscurity. As the pioneers swarmed this
country, dubbing Utah “The Beehive State” and opening newspapers with
names like The Sacramento Bee, 3,000 to 4,000 species of wild bees
buzzed the landscape, largely unnoticed.


Native bees do not typically share the desire of the honeybee to live
in a small space with 10,000 members of the family. They do not produce
honey to keep their colony fed through the winter. These bees have
different habits, some of them so singular that they make scientists
laugh out loud with puzzlement. The female of one species likes to
burrow nine feet under a sand dune to lay a single egg. Another chews
away at sandstone walls to make its tiny nest. Yet another hangs on the
stalks of dead plants at night, alone and balled up, resembling a
berry. Some develop fabulous coloration — one orchid bee is metallic
gold with a blue abdomen and a red and gold thorax.


And they pollinate plants, often better than European honeybees. The
natives’ pollinating abilities are attracting more attention because
the honeybee on which most American agriculture depends has run into a
series of problems: It started mating with aggressive Africanized bees
that swept over the border from Mexico in 1990, rendering its children
often impossible to work with. It is vulnerable to parasitic mites and
fungi, weakened by insecticides and disease. In the past several
months, headline after headline has announced a dramatic drop in
honeybee populations due to a mysterious malady called Colony Collapse
Disorder.


Wild bees don’t mate with Africanized bees, nor do they suffer from the
same diseases and mites that afflict honeybees. There has never been a
better time to develop wild bee pollination talent for use in American
agriculture. The bee lab in Logan — one of five federal research labs
devoted to bee research, and the only one that doesn’t deal in
honeybees — is doing just that.


“There’s no real danger of the honeybee going extinct,” said Jamie
Strange, an entomologist who is preparing to spend the afternoon
trapping bumblebees near his lab in Logan to study for use in
greenhouses and tomato production. “But it’s like investing. Diversify
your portfolio. Diversify!”



Source





Powered by ScribeFire.