Saturday, October 6, 2007

World moves into the ecological red

By Jeremy Lovell




LONDON (Reuters) - The world moved into 'ecological overdraft' on
Saturday, the point at which human consumption exceeds the ability of
the earth to sustain it in any year and goes into the red, the New
Economics Foundation think-tank said.




Ecological Debt Day this year is three days earlier than in 2006
which itself was three days earlier than in 2005. NEF said the date had
moved steadily backwards every year since humanity began living beyond
its environmental means in the 1980s.




"As the world creeps closer to irreversible global warming and goes
deeper into ecological debt, why on earth, say, would the UK export 20
tonnes of mineral water to Australia and then re-import 21 tonnes,"
said NEF director Andrew Simms.




"And why would that wasteful trade be more the rule than the exception," he added.




Not only was there a massive gulf between rich and poor but there
were deep variations in environmental profligacy between the rich
countries, NEF said.




If everyone in the world had the same consumption rates as in the
United States it would take 5.3 planet earths to support them, NEF
said, noting that the figure was 3.1 for France and Britain, 3.0 for
Spain, 2.5 for Germany and 2.4 for Japan.




But if everyone emulated China, which is building a coal-fired power
station every five days to feed its booming economy, it would take only
0.9 of a planet.




The NEF report comes as diplomatic momentum builds for UN
environment ministers meeting in December on the Indonesian island of
Bali to agree to start talks on a replacement for the Kyoto Protocol on
curbing climate change that expires in 2012.

Powered by ScribeFire.

Sunday, September 23, 2007

Rising Seas Likely to Flood U.S. History

SETH BORENSTEIN | September 22, 2007 10:32 PM EST |

Ultimately, rising seas will likely swamp the first American
settlement in Jamestown, Va., as well as the Florida launch pad that
sent the first American into orbit, many climate scientists are
predicting.

In about a century, some of the places that make America what it is may be slowly erased.


Global warming _ through a combination of melting glaciers,
disappearing ice sheets and warmer waters expanding _ is expected to
cause oceans to rise by one meter, or about 39 inches. It will happen
regardless of any future actions to curb greenhouse gases, several
leading scientists say. And it will reshape the nation.


Rising waters will lap at the foundations of old money Wall Street
and the new money towers of Silicon Valley. They will swamp the
locations of big city airports and major interstate highways.

Storm surges worsened by sea level rise will flood the waterfront
getaways of rich politicians _ the Bushes' Kennebunkport and John
Edwards' place on the Outer Banks. And gone will be many of the beaches
in Texas and Florida favored by budget-conscious students on Spring
Break.


That's the troubling outlook projected by coastal maps reviewed by
The Associated Press. The maps, created by scientists at the University
of Arizona, are based on data from the U.S. Geological Survey.


Few of the more than two dozen climate experts interviewed disagree
with the one-meter projection. Some believe it could happen in 50
years, others say 100, and still others say 150.


Sea level rise is "the thing that I'm most concerned about as a
scientist," says Benjamin Santer, a climate physicist at the Lawrence
Livermore National Laboratory in California.


"We're going to get a meter and there's nothing we can do about it,"
said University of Victoria climatologist Andrew Weaver, a lead author
of the February report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
Change in Paris. "It's going to happen no matter what _ the question is
when."


Sea level rise "has consequences about where people live and what
they care about," said Donald Boesch, a University of Maryland
scientist who has studied the issue. "We're going to be into this big
national debate about what we protect and at what cost."


This week, beginning with a meeting at the United Nations on Monday,
world leaders will convene to talk about fighting global warming. At
week's end, leaders will gather in Washington with President Bush.


Experts say that protecting America's coastlines would run well into the billions and not all spots could be saved.


And it's not just a rising ocean that is the problem. With it comes
an even greater danger of storm surge, from hurricanes, winter storms
and regular coastal storms, Boesch said. Sea level rise means higher
and more frequent flooding from these extreme events, he said.


All told, one meter of sea level rise in just the lower 48 states
would put about 25,000 square miles under water, according to Jonathan
Overpeck, director of the Institute for the Study of Planet Earth at
the University of Arizona. That's an area the size of West Virginia.


The amount of lost land is even greater when Hawaii and Alaska are included, Overpeck said.


The Environmental Protection Agency's calculation projects a land
loss of about 22,000 square miles. The EPA, which studied only the
Eastern and Gulf coasts, found that Louisiana, Florida, North Carolina,
Texas and South Carolina would lose the most land. But even inland
areas like Pennsylvania and the District of Columbia also have slivers
of at-risk land, according to the EPA.


This past summer's flooding of subways in New York could become far
more regular, even an everyday occurrence, with the projected sea rise,
other scientists said. And New Orleans' Katrina experience and the
daily loss of Louisiana wetlands _ which serve as a barrier that
weakens hurricanes _ are previews of what's to come there.


Florida faces a serious public health risk from rising salt water
tainting drinking water wells, said Joel Scheraga, the EPA's director
of global change research. And the farm-rich San Joaquin Delta in
California faces serious salt water flooding problems, other experts
said.


"Sea level rise is going to have more general impact to the
population and the infrastructure than almost anything else that I can
think of," said S. Jeffress Williams, a U.S. Geological Survey coastal
geologist in Woods Hole, Mass.


Even John Christy at the University of Alabama in Huntsville, a
scientist often quoted by global warming skeptics, said he figures the
seas will rise at least 16 inches by the end of the century. But he
tells people to prepare for a rise of about three feet just in case.


Williams says it's "not unreasonable at all" to expect that much in
100 years. "We've had a third of a meter in the last century."


The change will be a gradual process, one that is so slow it will be easy to ignore for a while.


"It's like sticking your finger in a pot of water on a burner and
you turn the heat on, Williams said. "You kind of get used to it."




Powered by ScribeFire.

Thursday, August 16, 2007

Could Time Travel Actually Be Possible?

Scientists claim to have broken the ultimate speed record - by making photons travel faster than light.

Exceeding the speed of light, 186,000 miles per second, is supposed to be completely impossible.

According to Einstein's special theory of relativity, it would take
an infinite amount of energy to accelerate an object through the light
barrier.

Travelling faster than light also turns back time with bizarre consequences.

An astronaut moving beyond light speed would theoretically arrive at his destination before leaving.

But
two German physicists now claim to have forced light to overcome its
own speed limit using the strange phenomenon known as quantum
tunnelling.

The research, published in the new Scientist
magazine, involved an experiment in which microwave photons, energetic
packets of light, appeared to travel "instantaneously" between two
prisms forming the halves of a cube placed a metre apart.

When the prisms were placed together, photons fired at one edge passed straight through them, as expected.




Powered by ScribeFire.

Thursday, July 19, 2007

Oil report's conclusion: Broad effort needed to satiate energy demand

Original Source
 

WASHINGTON:
It started with a simple question by
Samuel Bodman, the energy secretary: "What does the future hold for oil
and natural gas supply?"


The query was made in October 2005 in a one-page letter sent to Lee
Raymond, the former chairman of Exxon Mobil and head of the National
Petroleum Council, a federal advisory group representing the oil
industry.


After nearly two years, Raymond has finally delivered his answer.
The result is a colossal 476-page study entitled "Facing the Hard
Truths About Energy" that involved 350 participants, suggestions from
over 1,000 people, submissions by 19 foreign governments from Australia
to Saudi Arabia, and dozens of subcommittees.


The report, which was made public in Washington on Wednesday, was
billed as one of the most comprehensive analysis of the global energy
challenge.


In answering Bodman's question, it also provides a sobering picture
of the energy problem facing the United States and the world. Most
strikingly, some of the recommendations adopted by the petroleum
council also probably far exceed what Bodman had in mind, or what the
Bush administration is prepared to endorse.


Because the world's population is growing and living standards are
rising worldwide, energy consumption globally is expected to jump by
more than 50 percent over the next 25 years. But finding supplies to
match that growth is going to be increasingly tough, and will require
massive new investments in coming decades.


The council's report warns of "accumulating risks" to energy
production, including rising geopolitical barriers, inflation in costs,
dwindling petroleum engineers and growing constraints on carbon dioxide
emissions. Although it does not say so explicitly, the subtext of the
council's study suggests that high energy prices might be here to stay.


The study's release comes as frustrations grow over high energy
costs and questions are raised over the security of U.S. energy
supplies. Congress is currently considering a new law to bolster the
development of alternative fuels and increase vehicle fuel efficiency.


Unlike the Bush administration's energy task force, which was led by
Vice President Dick Cheney in 2001 and fought efforts to disclose whom
it met with, the petroleum council's study makes no secret of who
participated in its mammoth effort.


The list of contributors to the report is a roster of top industry
leaders and consultants, including senior executives from Exxon and
Chevron. But the council also enlisted the help of private think tanks,
academic institutions, banks, governmental agencies and a handful of
nongovernmental groups, including the Alliance to Save Energy and
Resources for the Future.


"It really reflects the zeitgeist of the times," said Daniel Yergin,
the chairman of Cambridge Energy Research Associates and an energy
consultant who participated in the council's study.


Given that the report reflects the views of the oil industry, some
of its conclusions would seem hardly surprising, for example in
dismissing predictions from so-called peak oil theorists that the
world's oil deposits are on the decline. Quite the contrary, the
industry's view is that the world's resources remain abundant.


"Fortunately, the world is not running out of energy resources," the
report says in a 40-page summary. "Coal, oil and natural gas will
remain indispensable to meeting total projected energy demand growth."


But while the council calls for expanding and diversifying
traditional energy supplies - oil and gas, coal and nuclear power - it
is also backs the development of alternative fuels, including biofuels
like ethanol or gas-to-liquids.


"There is no quick fix" to the energy challenge, Raymond said at a
press conference Wednesday. "To assume that we have the option of not
pursuing one of the sources of energy is a fake choice."


There were other surprises. The petroleum council said that the U.S.
government should take steps to reduce oil consumption. In fact, the
report's first recommendation is a call for the U.S. government to
moderate energy demand by increasing vehicle fuel economy standards,
the main sources of growth in oil demand around the world, and improve
energy efficiency at buildings and homes.


"The world will need better energy efficiency and all economic,
environmentally responsible energy sources available to support and
sustain future growth," the petroleum council's report says.


Perhaps the biggest surprise is that Raymond, who was well known for
his skepticism of the causes of global warming when he was chairman of
Exxon Mobil, has given his backing to a report addressing how oil
companies should deal with carbon emissions on a global level. The
report said oil companies and governments need to address carbon
emissions and offers some suggestions for how the industry can help
trapping carbon dioxide in underground reservoirs.


"It is a hard truth that policies aimed at curbing carbon emissions
will alter the energy mix, increase energy-related costs and require
reductions in demand growth," the report said. It said the U.S.
government should establish a regulatory framework for managing carbon
emissions, but did not recommend any specific policy.


Still, the bias toward the industry's view is not a surprise given
the history of the council. It was created by President Harry S. Truman
in 1946 to represent the position of the oil and gas industry to the
federal government and recommend policy options, after their successful
wartime collaboration.



Powered by ScribeFire.

Tuesday, July 10, 2007

U.S. leg of Live Earth hits key notes

Go to Original

BY GLENN GAMBOA



glenn.gamboa@newsday.com

EAST RUTHERFORD, N.J. - The American leg of Live Earth: The Concerts
for a Climate in Crisis, like the other concerts on all seven
continents, proved to be as complex as the issue it is trying to solve.

...for organizers, the solution will come with raised awareness.
"Today, more than 2 billion of us have come together in more than 130
countries on all seven continents," said former Vice President Al Gore,
the event's organizer. "Times like these demand action," he added,
after announcing the 7-Point Pledge that he hoped millions would sign
while watching the concert.

...it was
nonmusicians at this concert who made the most passionate pleas about
demanding action for the environment. "Get rid of all these rotten
politicians that we have in Washington, who are nothing more than
corporate toadies," said Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the environmentalist
author, president of Waterkeeper Alliance and Robert F. Kennedy's son,
who grew hoarse from shouting. "This is treason. And we need to start
treating them as traitors."

Primatologist Jane Goodall offered
a greeting in chimpanzee language, before saying, "Up in the North the
ice is melting, what will it take to melt the ice in the human heart?"


Powered by ScribeFire.

Thursday, June 28, 2007

Armies must ready for global warming role: Britain

Mon Jun 25, 2007 3:23PM EDT
REUTERS

By Jeremy Lovell




LONDON (Reuters) - Global warming is such a threat to security that
military planners must build it into their calculations, the head of
Britain's armed forces said on Monday.




Jock Stirrup, chief of the defense staff, said risks that climate
change could cause weakened states to disintegrate and produce major
humanitarian disasters or exploitation by armed groups had to become a
feature of military planning.




But he said first analyses showed planners would not have to switch
their geographical focus, because the areas most vulnerable to climate
change are those where security risks are already high.




"Just glance at a map of the areas most likely to be affected and
you are struck at once by the fact that they are exactly those parts of
the world where we see fragility, instability and weak governance today.




"It seems to me rather like pouring petrol onto a burning fire," Stirrup told the Chatham House think-tank in London.




British Foreign Secretary Margaret Beckett chaired the first debate
on climate change at the U.N. Security Council in April this year. She
argued that the potential for climate change to cause wars meant it
should be on the council's radar.




Stirrup said the unpredictability of the immediate effects of global
warming on rainfall patterns and storms meant flashpoints could be
advanced by years without warning.




He did not identify the problem areas, but Bert Metz of the U.N.'s
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change told the meeting they
included Central America, the Amazon Basin, large parts of north,
central and southern Africa and swathes of Asia.




Scientists say average temperatures will rise by between 1.8 and 4.0
degrees Celsius this century due to burning fossil fuels for power and
transport, melting ice caps, bringing floods, droughts and famines, and
putting millions of lives at risk.

Stirrup said the security threat was far more immediate than those figures might suggest.




"If temperatures rise towards the upper end of the forecast range we
could already start to see serious physical consequences by 2040 -- and
that is if things get no worse."




"If things do get worse you don't need to come very much forward
from 2040 before, in my terms at least, you are talking about the day
after tomorrow," Stirrup said.




He said the September 11, 2001 attacks on New York and Washington
showed the devastation that attacks fuelled by political, economic and
social deprivation could achieve.




"Now add in the effects of climate change. Poverty and despair
multiply, resentment surges and people look for someone to blame," he
said.




Even if the world agreed quickly on a way of equitably tackling the
climate crisis -- which was far from sure -- the nature of the problem
meant a significant degree of adverse change was already in the
pipeline.




"That rapidity, alongside the size of the global population and the
complexity of today's society, leaves us particularly vulnerable,"
Stirrup said. "It is bound to present substantial security challenges
of one kind or another."




Asked on the margins of the meeting if that meant military planners
should opt for preemptive action where they saw a security crisis
emerging, he said: "Only in the sense of building governance.
Recognizing the problem is the first step."




Powered by ScribeFire.

Saturday, June 23, 2007

'Mile-wide UFO' spotted by British airline pilot


ThisIslondon.co.uk

One of the largest UFOs ever seen has been observed by the crew and passengers of an airliner over the Channel Islands.

An official air-miss report on the incident several weeks ago appears in Pilot magazine.

Aurigny Airlines captain Ray Bowyer, 50, flying close to Alderney first spotted
the object, described as "a cigar-shaped brilliant white light".

Aurigny Airlines captain Ray Bowyer, 50, described what he thought to be a UFO
as 'a cigar-shaped brilliant white light', similar to the image
supplied by Dennis Plunket of the British Flying Saucer bureau

As the plane got closer the captain viewed it through binoculars and said:
"It was a very sharp, thin yellow object with a green area.

"It was 2,000ft up and stationary. I thought it was about 10 miles away,
although I later realised it was approximately 40 miles from us. At
first, I thought it was the size of a [Boeing] 737.

"But it must have been much bigger because of how far away it was. It could have been as much as a mile wide."

Continuing his approach to Guernsey, Bowyer then spied a "second identical object further to the west".

He said: "It was exactly the same but looked smaller because it was
further away. It was closer to Guernsey. I can't explain it. This was
clearly visual for about nine minutes.

"I'm certainly not saying that it was something of another world. All I'm saying is that I have
never seen anything like it before in all my years of flying."

The sightings were confirmed by passengers Kate and John Russell. John, 74,
said: "I saw an orange light. It was like an elongated oval."

The sightings were also confirmed by an unnamed pilot with the Blue Islands airline.

The Civil Aviation Authority safety notice states that a Tri-Lander aircraft flying close to Alderney spotted the object.

"Certain parts of the report have not been published. I cannot say why," said a senior CAA source.

Earlier this year, however, the MOD declared its intentions to open its UFO files to the public.





Powered by ScribeFire.

Thursday, June 21, 2007

Vice President Exempts His Office from the Requirements for Protecting Classified Information

Thursday, June 21, 2007

Administration Oversight



The Oversight Committee has learned that over the objections of the
National Archives, Vice President Cheney exempted his office from the
presidential order that establishes government-wide procedures for
safeguarding classified national security information. The Vice
President asserts that his office is not an “entity within the
executive branch.”




As described in a letter from Chairman Waxman to the Vice
President, the National Archives protested the Vice President's
position in letters written in June 2006 and August 2006. When these
letters were ignored, the National Archives wrote to Attorney General
Alberto Gonzales in January 2007 to seek a resolution of the impasse.
The Vice President's staff responded by seeking to abolish the agency
within the Archives that is responsible for implementing the
President's executive order.




In his letter to the Vice President, Chairman Waxman writes:
"I question both the legality and wisdom of your actions. ... [I]t
would appear particularly irresponsible to give an office with your
history of security breaches an exemption from the safeguards that
apply to all other executive branch officials."




A fact sheet prepared by Chairman Waxman describes other
instances in which the Vice President's office has sought to avoid
oversight and accountability.




Powered by ScribeFire.

Wednesday, June 20, 2007

'Earth Mother getting angry'

American Indians fight climate change

The Associated Press

June 18. 2007 8:00AM



From New Hampshire to California, American Indian leaders are speaking out more forcefully about the danger of climate change.



Members of six tribes recently gathered near the Baker River in the White Mountains for a sacred ceremony honoring "Earth Mother." Talking Hawk, a Mohawk Indian who asked to be identified by his Indian name, pointed to the river's tea-colored water as proof that the overwhelming amount of pollution humans have produced has caused changes around the globe.



"It's August color. It's not normal," he said.



"Earth Mother is fighting back - not only from the four winds, but also from underneath," he said. "Scientists call it global warming. We call it Earth Mother getting angry."



At a United Nations meeting last month, several American Indian leaders spoke at a session called "Indigenous Perspectives on Climate Change." Also in May, tribal representatives from Alaska and northern Canada - where pack ice has vanished earlier and earlier each spring - traveled to Washington to press their case.



Powered by ScribeFire.

Saturday, June 16, 2007

Things Your Media Momma Didn't Tell You

Friday, June 15, 2007

FMNM

Free-Market News Network, Corp.








The fact that most Americans oppose the war in Iraq, and want the
president impeached, is testimony to the native intelligence and common
sense of the citizens of this nation.



It sure isn't thanks to the quality of the news we're getting here in America.!



Here are some of the things you don't know if you just depend on the corporate media for your information:



  1. Most Americans would like to see this
    president and vice president impeached and removed from office.
    Newsweek magazine published a scientific poll last October showing that
    51 percent of us favor impeachment (including 29 percent of
    Republicans!), but the corporate media, which normally hasn't met a
    poll it won't publish, didn't publicize this one. And now, when the
    numbers supporting impeachment are surely even higher, you can't even
    pay a polling outfit to ask the question. No wonder most people who
    favor impeachment still think they're odd ducks.
  2. There is a bill, filed in the House of Representatives on
    April 24 by Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-OH), calling for the impeachment of
    Vice President Cheney. Since it was filed, it has gained six
    co-sponsors, including a member of the House Democratic leadership,
    Rep. Janice Shakowsky (D-IL). Most major media have ignored this
    important story completely. Most Americans also don't know that the
    Vermont State Senate voted overwhelmingly this spring to call on
    Congress to impeach the president.
  3. The president has been declared a felon in federal court.
    Yet even after Federal District Judge Anna Diggs Taylor ruled last
    August that President Bush and the National Security Agency were
    committing serial Class A felonies and were violating both the First
    and Fourth Amendments by spying on Americans' communications without
    first obtaining warrants, Bush continued ordering the NSA to continue
    the patently illegal program for at least half a year. In reports on
    the spying program, the corporate media never mention that it has been
    declared a felonious activity by the federal court.
  4. Fifteen Democratic Party state organizations have passed
    impeachment resolutions calling on Democrats in Congress to initiate
    impeachment proceedings against the president and vice president. The
    most recent of these, the Democratic Party of Oklahoma, passed its
    resolution at the party's annual convention on May 19. Other Democratic
    Party conventions, in states from Nevada and California to
    Massachusetts and North Carolina, have passed similar resolutions. Most
    have been ignored by the corporate media even in their own states.
  5. Bush's so-called "coalition of the willing" is not so
    willing and is not really much of a coalition either. When's the last
    time you've heard how many countries are on board with the US in the
    war and occupation of Iraq? The reality? Britain, the only significant
    contributor of combat troops besides the U.S., is pulling out, as did
    Italy and Spain, and many other countries, like Denmark, Lithuania and
    others, plan to be out of Iraq by August or at the latest December. One
    indication of the seriousness of situation: The Pentagon no longer
    lists the countries that are members of the "coalition." The only
    mainstream report I've seen laying this out this collapse in
    international support for Bush's war was in USA Today last February.
  6. The Homeland Security Department last year awarded
    Halliburton $385 million in a no-bid contract to construct prison camps
    designed to hold tens of thousands of unspecified prisoners in the
    event of domestic unrest. Meanwhile, President Bush has signed a bill
    altering the insurrection act so that he can declare martial rule and
    order active duty troops to take charge anywhere in the domestic US in
    the event of "public disorder." No one in the corporate media has
    reported on these developments or asked the White House to explain what
    it's all about.
  7. There is evidence that Cheney, as CEO of Halliburton, was a
    patron of the Washington Madam whose client book of high-class
    call-girls is causing many in Washington political circles-mostly
    Republicans it appears, who apparently need to pay for their sex-to
    sweat. So far no mention of the Cheney angle in the corporate media,
    though they've been having fun with the broader story of a political
    sex scandal. No mention either of how a brave West Point cadet refused
    to shake Cheney's hand on stage when the vice president was handing out
    this year's diplomas at the Army's premiere academy.
  8. Among the "worst of the worst" of the "evildoers" captured
    and held as "enemy combatants" at Guantanamo were children, some of
    them preteens and kids who were under 15 when captured and brought to
    Cuba-so many in fact that the military had to set up a special
    facility, called Camp Iguana, just for adolescent and pre-pubescent
    "fighters." The corporate media have barely reported on this atrocity
    (the New York Times ran only one article mentioning child captives, in
    June 2005). The only wider coverage of this outrage came recently when
    the government tried to prosecute one such alleged child
    "terrorist"-Omar Khadr-only to have the military judge in charge toss
    his case out because the government had misclassified him. Khadr, we
    learned, was captured in 2001 in Afghanistan at the ripe age of 15,
    making him one of the older child captives brought to and interrogated
    at Guantanamo. Under international law, the U.S. was supposed to treat
    this and other child soldiers as victims, not as war criminals. Khadr,
    a Canadian by birth, instead has spent five years doing hard time in US
    captivity.
  9. Well-researched reports on the rampant theft of both the
    2000 and 2004 elections, and on Republican plans for theft of the 2008
    election, such as Mark Crispin Miller's Fooled Again, have gone
    unmentioned in the corporate media. Books on the subject, like Miller's
    and like Greg Palast's best selling Armed Madhouse, have never been
    reviewed.
  10. And of course, there's my own book. The Case for
    Impeachment, despite its having sold over 20,000 copies in hardcover,
    and despite its having now come out in a mass-market paperback edition,
    in both cases printed by a mainstream publisher, St. Martin's Press,
    has not received a single review in the corporate media. In this, my
    co-author Barbara Olshansky and I are not alone. None of the books on
    the impeachable crimes of this administration, including one by
    Nixon-era impeachment panelist and former congresswoman Elizabeth
    Holtzman, and one by Judiciary Chair Rep. John Conyers, has been
    reviewed by a mainstream media outlet.


What we're talking about here is a media blackout of important stories and news.



Thanks to the internet and to the grapevine, and thanks to their
basic native intelligence, most Americans seem to understand that we're
being lied to and cheated. What the media blackout of important news
does manage to do, however, is keep us all thinking that we are in a
minority in opposing things like illegal wars, a trampled Constitution,
and stolen elections.



In fact, however, we're actually the majority.



Once we realize this, maybe we will have a movement, instead of a just nation of isolated cynics and complainers.





Powered by ScribeFire.

Native hum

As honeybees vanish, farmers turn to the wild pollinators in their back yards


In 1940, alfalfa-seed farmers in the desert of central Utah made an
interesting discovery: The primary pollinator of their crop was not the
honeybee, but the alkali bees that nested in the region’s salt flats.
For all its status as the workhorse of American agriculture, the
European honeybee didn’t really like foraging in alfalfa. But alkali
bees loved it, pollinating some 5,500 flowers daily. Farmers lucky
enough to live next to them were raising three times more alfalfa seed
per acre than those who didn’t.


From Utah to Washington state, farmers started transplanting thousands
of cubic feet of soil with alkali bee nests to aid in the production of
alfalfa seed — a hugely important crop because the alfalfa grown in
hayfields produces almost no seed on its own. The largest managed
alkali bee nesting bed is now five acres in size and is home to more
than 5 million bees.


“It gives me conniptions, it’s so big,” says Jim Cane, an entomologist
at the U.S. Department of Agriculture Bee Biology and Systematics
Laboratory in Logan, Utah. “It’s just roaring with bees. The ground is
shimmering for several acres.” Cane says these farmers harvest at least
20 percent more seed than needed to break even.


The humble alkali bee had turned the attention of a whole sector of
commercial farmers away from the European honeybee. It was the first
time this had happened. It would not be the last.


While honeybees spent thousands of years honestly earning their
place in our hearts with their honey production, easily manipulated
colonies, generalist pollinating tendencies and heroic work ethic,
their wild cousins lived in obscurity. As the pioneers swarmed this
country, dubbing Utah “The Beehive State” and opening newspapers with
names like The Sacramento Bee, 3,000 to 4,000 species of wild bees
buzzed the landscape, largely unnoticed.


Native bees do not typically share the desire of the honeybee to live
in a small space with 10,000 members of the family. They do not produce
honey to keep their colony fed through the winter. These bees have
different habits, some of them so singular that they make scientists
laugh out loud with puzzlement. The female of one species likes to
burrow nine feet under a sand dune to lay a single egg. Another chews
away at sandstone walls to make its tiny nest. Yet another hangs on the
stalks of dead plants at night, alone and balled up, resembling a
berry. Some develop fabulous coloration — one orchid bee is metallic
gold with a blue abdomen and a red and gold thorax.


And they pollinate plants, often better than European honeybees. The
natives’ pollinating abilities are attracting more attention because
the honeybee on which most American agriculture depends has run into a
series of problems: It started mating with aggressive Africanized bees
that swept over the border from Mexico in 1990, rendering its children
often impossible to work with. It is vulnerable to parasitic mites and
fungi, weakened by insecticides and disease. In the past several
months, headline after headline has announced a dramatic drop in
honeybee populations due to a mysterious malady called Colony Collapse
Disorder.


Wild bees don’t mate with Africanized bees, nor do they suffer from the
same diseases and mites that afflict honeybees. There has never been a
better time to develop wild bee pollination talent for use in American
agriculture. The bee lab in Logan — one of five federal research labs
devoted to bee research, and the only one that doesn’t deal in
honeybees — is doing just that.


“There’s no real danger of the honeybee going extinct,” said Jamie
Strange, an entomologist who is preparing to spend the afternoon
trapping bumblebees near his lab in Logan to study for use in
greenhouses and tomato production. “But it’s like investing. Diversify
your portfolio. Diversify!”



Source





Powered by ScribeFire.

Tuesday, May 29, 2007

US to Meatpackers: Don't Do Mad Cow Test

By MATT APUZZO


WASHINGTON (AP) - The Bush administration said Tuesday it will fight to
keep meatpackers from testing all their animals for mad cow disease.


The Agriculture Department tests less than 1 percent of slaughtered
cows for the disease, which can be fatal to humans who eat tainted
beef. But Kansas-based Creekstone Farms Premium Beef wants to test all
of its cows.


Larger meat companies feared that move because, if Creekstone tested
its meat and advertised it as safe, they might have to perform the
expensive test, too.


A federal judge ruled in March that such tests must be allowed. The
ruling was to take effect June 1, but the Agriculture Department said
Tuesday it would appeal - effectively delaying the testing until the
court challenge plays out.


Mad cow disease, or bovine spongiform encephalopathy, is linked to more than 150 human deaths worldwide, mostly in Britain.


There have been three cases of mad cow disease in the U.S. The first,
in December 2003 in Washington state, was in a cow that had been
imported from Canada. The second, in 2005, was in a Texas-born cow. The
third was confirmed last year in an Alabama cow.


The Agriculture Department argued that widespread testing could lead to
a false positive that would harm the meat industry. U.S. District Judge
James Robertson noted that Creekstone sought to use the same test the
government relies on and said the government didn't have the authority
to restrict it.





Powered by ScribeFire.

Algae Biodiesel May Soon Be Reality

by Green Options Blogger Clayton Bodie Cornell. Originally published May 24, 2007.



The biodiesel community has always been marked by spirited enthusiasm, a clear sense of mission, and the dream that biodiesel could one day play a significant role in our energy future. That dream may soon be a reality. Researchers at Utah State University say that farming algae, with reported oil yields of 10,000 gallons per acre, could become an economically feasible biodiesel feedstock by the end of the decade.



This is the Holy Grail of biodiesel: an oil source that could make a serious dent in our fossil fuel consumption. Our most productive feedstock today, the oil palm, doesn’t even come close with yields of 635 gallons/acre, and is followed distantly by the U.S. standard, soy, at 48 gallons of oil/acre.





More





Powered by ScribeFire.

Tuesday, May 15, 2007

Pentagon Limits Troops' Web Access...

Yahoo News

WASHINGTON - Lt. Daniel Zimmerman, an infantry platoon leader in
Iraq, puts a blog on the Internet every now and then "to basically keep my friends and family up to date" back home.

It just got tougher to do that for Zimmerman and a lot of other U.S. soldiers. No more using the military's computer system to socialize and trade videos on MySpace, YouTube and nine other Web sites, the
Pentagon says.

Citing security concerns and technological limits, the Pentagon has cut off access to those sites for personnel using the Defense Department's computer network. The change limits use of the popular outlets for service members on the front lines, who regularly post videos and journals.

"I put my blog on there and my family reads it," said Zimmerman, 29, a platoon leader with B Company, 1st Battalion, 28th Infantry Regiment.

"It scares the crap out of them sometimes," he said.

"I keep it as vague as possible," he said. "I'm pretty responsible about it. It's just basically to tell a little bit about my life over here" he said.

He's regularly at a base where he doesn't have Defense Department access to the Internet, but he has used it when he goes to bigger bases. He'll have to rely on a private account all the time now.

Memos about the change went out in February, and it took effect last week. It does not affect the Internet cafes that soldiers in Iraq use that are not connected to the Defense Department's network. The cafe sites are run by a private vendor, FUBI (For US By Iraqis).

Also, the ban also does not affect other sites, such as Yahoo, and does not prevent soldiers from sending messages and photos to their families by e-mail.

Monday, May 7, 2007

Gore sees 'spiritual crisis' in warming

Playing equal parts visionary, cheerleader and comedian, Al Gore brought his message of how to fight global warming to a capacity crowd of receptive architects Saturday in San Antonio.

The former vice president referred continually to a "new way of thinking" that is emerging in the country and offered hope in the battle to control the effects global warming will have on the planet.

"It's in part a spiritual crisis," Gore told the crowd in the Convention Center at the American Institute of Architects national convention. "It's a crisis of our own self-definition — who we are. Are we creatures destined to destroy our own species? Clearly not."

Full Article





Powered by ScribeFire.

S Pacific to stop bottom trawling

BBC News



A quarter of the world's oceans will be protected
from fishing boats which drag heavy nets across the sea floor, South
Pacific nations have agreed.


The landmark deal will restrict bottom trawling, which
experts say destroys coral reefs and stirs up clouds of sediment that
suffocate marine life.


Observers and monitoring systems will ensure vessels remain five nautical miles from marine ecosystems at risk.


The South Pacific contains the last pristine deep-sea marine environment.


It extends from the Equator to the Antarctic and from Australia to the western coast of South America.


The high seas encompass all areas not included in the territorial sea or in the internal waters of a country.








'Precautionary measures'


The agreement reached in the coastal town of Renaca in Chile will come into force on 30 September.


It will close to bottom trawling areas where vulnerable
marine ecosystems are known or are likely to exist, unless a prior
assessment is undertaken and highly precautionary protective measures
are implemented.





Powered by ScribeFire.

Sunday, May 6, 2007

Memo to media and pundits:

The public wants Dems to be confrontational with Bush and the GOP.



TMP Cafe



"...the choice the public faces isn't between "fighting" and "gridlock" on the one hand, and "bipartisan cooperation" on the other. Rather, it's between (a) accepting the disastrous Bush/GOP status quo; and (b) backing Democratic efforts to change it. And the public supports the latter. Even though those efforts are partisan and confrontational. Is that really so hard to fathom?



In a front page Washington Post article today by Jonathan Weisman and Lyndsey Layton about how the Democratic Congress is faltering, the reporters quote Leon Panetta making the case that  Dems had better watch out and not be too confrontational with the White House:



    "The primary message coming out of the November election was that the American people are sick and tired of the fighting and the gridlock, and they want both the president and Congress to start governing the country," warned Leon E. Panetta, a chief of staff in Bill Clinton's White House. "It just seems to me the Democrats, if they fail for whatever reason to get a domestic agenda enacted ... will pay a price."



Panetta, it appears, has become the go-to person for reporters eager to make the case that Dems are at risk of overreaching or failing. Indeed, it just so happens that this is the second time in just over a month that WaPo has gone to Panetta to get a quote arguing this. Funny coincidence, that.



But let's put that aside and ask a larger question: Is it really true that the public is fed up with partisanship and "sick and tired of the fighting," as Panetta says, and as David Broder and Joe Lieberman keep lecturing?



No doubt one could dig up polls showing that people don't like generically defined "fighting" or "gridlock." But here's another way to look at this: The polls show clearly that the public strongly supports efforts by Dems to confront Bush both on Iraq and on corruption. Check out the numbers in this recent Pew poll:





Powered by ScribeFire.

Researchers: Organic push won't hurt world food supply

ROME (AP) — Organic food has long been
considered a niche market and a luxury for wealthy consumers. But
researchers told a U.N. conference Saturday that a large-scale shift to
organic agriculture could actually help fight world hunger while
improving the environment.

Crop yields initially can drop as much as 50%
when industrialized, conventional agriculture using chemical
fertilizers and pesticides is converted to organic. While such
decreases often even out over time and promote other benefits, the
figures have kept the organic movement largely on the sidelines of
discussions about feeding the hungry.


Researchers in Denmark found, however, that
there would not be any serious negative effect on food security for
sub-Saharan Africa if 50% of agricultural land in the food exporting
regions of Europe and North America were converted to organic by 2020.


While total food production would drop, the
amount per crop would be much less than previously assumed, and the
drop in world food prices that resulted could be mitigated by
improvements in the land and other benefits, the study found.


A similar conversion to organic farming in
sub-Saharan Africa could help the region's hungry because it could
reduce their need to import food, Niels Halberg, a senior scientist at
the Danish Research Center for Organic Food and Farming, told the U.N.
conference on "Organic Agriculture and Food Security."



Farmers who go back to using traditional
agricultural methods would not have to spend money on expensive
chemicals and would grow more diverse crops that are more sustainable,
the report said. In addition, if their food is certified organic,
farmers could export any surpluses, bringing in cash since organic food
has such premium prices.


Alexander Mueller, assistant director-general of
the U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization, or FAO, praised the report
and noted that projections indicated that the number of hungry people
in sub-Saharan Africa was only expected to grow.


Considering that the impact of climate change
will target the world's poor and most vulnerable, "a shift to organic
agriculture could be beneficial," he said.


The Rome-based FAO's Nadia El-Hage Scialabba,
who organized the conference, pointed to other studies of a
hypothetical food supply that she said indicated that organic
agriculture could produce enough food per capita to feed the current
world's population.


One such study, by the University of Michigan,
found that a global shift to organic agriculture would yield at least
2,641 kilocalories per person per day, just under the world's current
production of 2,786, and as many as 4,381 kilocalories per person per
day, researchers reported.


"These models suggest that organic agriculture
has the potential to secure a global food supply, just as conventional
agriculture today, but with reduced environmental impacts," Scialabba
said in a paper presented to the conference.


However, she stressed that the studies were only that — economic models.


The United Nations defines organic agriculture
as a "holistic" food system that avoids the use of synthetic
fertilizers and pesticides, minimizes pollution and optimizes the
health of plants, animals and people. It is commercially practiced in
120 countries and represented a $40 billion market last year, Scialabba
said.











Powered by ScribeFire.

Researchers: Organic push won't hurt world food supply

ROME (AP) — Organic food has long been
considered a niche market and a luxury for wealthy consumers. But
researchers told a U.N. conference Saturday that a large-scale shift to
organic agriculture could actually help fight world hunger while
improving the environment.

Crop yields initially can drop as much as 50%
when industrialized, conventional agriculture using chemical
fertilizers and pesticides is converted to organic. While such
decreases often even out over time and promote other benefits, the
figures have kept the organic movement largely on the sidelines of
discussions about feeding the hungry.


Researchers in Denmark found, however, that
there would not be any serious negative effect on food security for
sub-Saharan Africa if 50% of agricultural land in the food exporting
regions of Europe and North America were converted to organic by 2020.


While total food production would drop, the
amount per crop would be much less than previously assumed, and the
drop in world food prices that resulted could be mitigated by
improvements in the land and other benefits, the study found.


A similar conversion to organic farming in
sub-Saharan Africa could help the region's hungry because it could
reduce their need to import food, Niels Halberg, a senior scientist at
the Danish Research Center for Organic Food and Farming, told the U.N.
conference on "Organic Agriculture and Food Security."



Farmers who go back to using traditional
agricultural methods would not have to spend money on expensive
chemicals and would grow more diverse crops that are more sustainable,
the report said. In addition, if their food is certified organic,
farmers could export any surpluses, bringing in cash since organic food
has such premium prices.


Alexander Mueller, assistant director-general of
the U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization, or FAO, praised the report
and noted that projections indicated that the number of hungry people
in sub-Saharan Africa was only expected to grow.


Considering that the impact of climate change
will target the world's poor and most vulnerable, "a shift to organic
agriculture could be beneficial," he said.


The Rome-based FAO's Nadia El-Hage Scialabba,
who organized the conference, pointed to other studies of a
hypothetical food supply that she said indicated that organic
agriculture could produce enough food per capita to feed the current
world's population.


One such study, by the University of Michigan,
found that a global shift to organic agriculture would yield at least
2,641 kilocalories per person per day, just under the world's current
production of 2,786, and as many as 4,381 kilocalories per person per
day, researchers reported.


"These models suggest that organic agriculture
has the potential to secure a global food supply, just as conventional
agriculture today, but with reduced environmental impacts," Scialabba
said in a paper presented to the conference.


However, she stressed that the studies were only that — economic models.


The United Nations defines organic agriculture
as a "holistic" food system that avoids the use of synthetic
fertilizers and pesticides, minimizes pollution and optimizes the
health of plants, animals and people. It is commercially practiced in
120 countries and represented a $40 billion market last year, Scialabba
said.











Powered by ScribeFire.

Saturday, May 5, 2007

Freeze 'condemned Neanderthals'

A sharp freeze could have dealt the killer blow
that finished off our evolutionary cousins the Neanderthals, according
to a new study.


The ancient humans are thought to have died out in most parts of Europe by about 35,000 years ago.


And now new data from their last known refuge in
southern Iberia indicates the final population was probably beaten by a
cold spell some 24,000 years ago.


The research is reported by experts from the Gibraltar Museum and Spain.


They say a climate downturn may have caused a drought,
placing pressure on the last surviving Neanderthals by reducing their
supplies of fresh water and killing off the animals they hunted.


Sediment cores drilled from the sea bed near the
Balearic Islands show the average sea-surface temperature plunged to 8C
(46F). Modern-day sea surface temperatures in the same region vary from
14C (57F) to 20C (68F).


In addition, increased amounts of sand were deposited in
the sea and the amount of river water running into the sea also
plummeted.


Southern refuge


Neanderthals appear in the fossil record about 350,000
years ago and, at their peak, these squat, physically powerful hunters
dominated a wide range, spanning Britain and Iberia in the west to
Israel in the south and Uzbekistan in the east.


Our own species, Homo sapiens, evolved in Africa, and displaced the Neanderthals after entering Europe about 40,000 years ago.

Full Article






Powered by ScribeFire.

Climate change 'can be tackled'

The growth in greenhouse gas emissions can be curbed
at reasonable cost, experts at a major UN climate change conference in
Bangkok have agreed.


Boosting renewable energy, reducing deforestation and improving energy efficiency can all help, they said.


This is the third report this year from the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), and aims to set out
the costs and benefits of various policies.


IPCC chair Rajendra Pachauri said the report was "stunning".

Full Article





Powered by ScribeFire.

Tuesday, May 1, 2007

Organism found at SRS amazes scientific world

By Rob Pavey| Staff Writer
Augusta Chronicle

Monday, April 30, 2007

One of the world's tiniest celebrities hails from one of the planet's toughest neighborhoods.

Its story began a couple of years ago, when scientists fished a
strange slime off a probe used to examine decades-old, high-level
nuclear waste inside tanks stored at Savannah River Site.

"At first, nobody was sure what it was," said Christopher "Kitt"

Bagwell, a senior scientist at the top-secret Savannah River National
Laboratory.

Turns out, the greenish-orange slime was alive.

The more it was studied, the more it enamored scientists who were
fascinated with its ability to survive radiation doses thousands of
times greater than what is considered lethal to humans.

"Finding an organism in such a toxic environment is very unexpected," said Dr. Bagwell, who will present a paper about the bacteria - dubbed kineococcus radiotolerans - to the American Society for Microbiology next month.

In addition to thriving in the face of normally-lethal radiation, the organism also demonstrates remarkable survival characteristics in terms of its DNA.

Humans and most organisms can tolerate few breaks in DNA molecules, he said, but kineococcus radiotolerans has the ability to reassemble itself.

"With this organism, we can take an intact DNA molecule, blast it
into little pieces, and in five to six hours the organism is restored
and growing normally again," Dr. Bagwell said.

Dr. Bagwell and others who have studied the organism hope further
research will yield clues that could aid in medical research, cancer
studies and other areas.

"There's a lot of excitement about this organism because of its
ability to withstand tremendous abuse," he said. "What we don't know is
how it does these things - and what more it can do. That's the
direction we're going now."

Powered by ScribeFire.

Sunday, April 29, 2007

U.S. memorializes massacre of Native Americans

SAND CREEK MASSACRE NATIONAL HISTORIC SITE, Colorado (AP) --

More than 142 years after a band of state militia volunteers massacred
150 sleeping Southern Cheyenne and Arapaho Indians in a misdirected act
of vengeance, a memorial to the tragic event was officially dedicated
Saturday.

The Sand Creek Massacre National Historic site, 160
miles southeast of Denver on Big Sandy Creek in Kiowa County, pays
tribute to those killed in the November 29, 1864, attack.

Seeking revenge for the killings of several settlers by Indians, 700 militia
members slaughtered nearly everyone in the village. Most were women or
children.

Descendants of some of the victims were among several
hundred people at Saturday's dedication on the rolling hills of the
southeastern Colorado plains. A mock village of a dozen tepees was set
up in a grove of cottonwood trees along the creek that historians
believe marks the site of the killings.

Full Article

Powered by ScribeFire.

Thursday, April 26, 2007

Poll Finds Majority See Threat in Global Warming


Americans in large bipartisan
numbers say the heating of the earth’s atmosphere is having serious effects on the environment now or will soon and think that it is necessary to take immediate steps to reduce its effects, the latest New York Times/CBS News poll finds.

Ninety percent of Democrats, 80 percent of independents and 60 percent of Republicans said immediate action was required to curb the warming of the atmosphere and deal with its effects on the global climate. Nineteen percent said it was not necessary to act now, and 1 percent said no steps were needed.

Several recent international reports have concluded with near certainty that human activities are the main cause of global warming since 1950. The poll found that 84 percent of Americans see human activity as at least contributing to warming.

The poll also found that Americans want the United States to support
conservation and to be a global leader in addressing environmental
problems and developing alternative energy sources to reduce reliance
on fossil fuels like oil and coal.

Powered by ScribeFire.

Draft Gore Petition

A new site with sign-up for Gore candidacy

Please sign below and spread the word
to all your friends and fellow activists. With your help, we can create an unprecedented show of support for Al Gore that will hopefully make a Gore candidacy in 2008 a reality. Thank you.

Dear Vice President Gore:

Americans from every corner of our nation are calling on you. Please listen to
our plea and run for the Democratic nomination for the presidency of
the United States in 2008.

Never before has America needed a leader of your stature, vision and experience more than now. The next presidential election will be the most crucial one in our history, and you are the only Democrat who can unite the country and lead us to victory. And this country -- indeed,
the entire world -- cannot afford anything less.

Our nation and the planet itself are entering “a period of consequences,” as you so well stated in “An Inconvenient Truth,” but in more ways than one. We are ruled by a government
of the powerful and for the powerful -- a government that tramples our Constitution, wages unjust war in our name, sacrifices our economic future, and puts our very planet on the endangered species list.

America and the world need you now more than ever. Be our candidate. Run for president. And we pledge that we'll be there for you every day until the last vote is counted.

Sincerely,

The Undersigned,













Powered by ScribeFire.

Friday, April 20, 2007

Study Shows Sudden Sea Level Surges Threaten One Billion

By Michael Kahn
Reuters
Friday 20 April 2007

San Francisco - More than one billion people live in low-lying areas where a sudden surge in sea level could prove as disastrous as the 2004 Asian tsunami, according to new research presented Thursday.

New mapping techniques show how much land would be lost and how many people affected by rapid sea level rises that are often triggered by storms and earthquakes, a U.S. Geological Survey-led team determined.

E. Lynn Usery, who led the team, said nearly one-quarter of the world's population lives below 100 feet above sea level - the size of the biggest surge during the 2004 tsunami that pulverized villages along the Indian Ocean and killed 230,000 people.

"What we are suggesting is what kind of areas are at risk (in) a catastrophic event," Usery told a meeting of the Association of American Geographers.

"The fact that there are that many people living at that sea level means there are probably a lot of people potentially in harm's way."

The team also found that a 100-foot rise in sea level would cover 3.7 million square miles of land worldwide.

A rise of just 16 feet would affect 669 million people and 2 million square miles of land would be lost.

Sea levels are currently rising about 0.04 to 0.08 inches each year, making it unlikely such a scenario would suddenly occur across the globe, Usery said.


Powered by ScribeFire.

Saturday, April 14, 2007

Scientists Levitate Small Animals

Scientists have now levitated small live animals using sounds that are, well, uplifting.



In the past, researchers at Northwestern Polytechnical University in Xi'an, China, used ultrasound fields to successfully levitate globs of the heaviest solid and liquid—iridium and mercury, respectively. The aim of their work is to learn how to manufacture everything from pharmaceuticals to alloys without the aid of containers. At times compounds are too corrosive for containers to hold, or they react with containers in other undesirable ways.



"An interesting question is, 'What will happen if a living animal is put into the acoustic field?' Will it also be stably levitated?" researcher Wenjun Xie, a materials physicist at Northwestern Polytechnical University, told LiveScience.



Xie and his colleagues employed an ultrasound emitter and reflector that generated a sound pressure field between them. The emitter produced roughly 20-millimeter-wavelength sounds, meaning it could in theory levitate objects half that wavelength or less.



After the investigators got the ultrasound field going, they used tweezers to carefully place animals between the emitter and reflector. The scientists found they could float ants, beetles, spiders, ladybugs, bees, tadpoles and fish up to a little more than a third of an inch long in midair. When they levitated the fish and tadpole, the researchers added water to the ultrasound field every minute via syringe.



The levitated ant tried crawling in the air and struggled to escape by rapidly flexing its legs, although it generally failed because its feet find little purchase in the air. The ladybug tried flying away but also failed when the field was too strong to break away from.



"We must control the levitation force carefully, because they try to fly away," Xie said. "An interesting moment was when my colleagues and I had to catch escaping ladybugs."



The ant and ladybug appeared fine after 30 minutes of levitation, although the fish did not fare as well, due to the inadequate water supply, the scientists report.



"Our results may provide some methods or ideas for biology research," Xie said. "We have tried to hatch eggs of fish acoustic levitation."



The research team reported their findings online Nov. 20 in the journal Applied Physics Letters.





Powered by ScribeFire.

Saturday, April 7, 2007

Convention Cleanup Includes Pigeon Poop

AP  |  April 5, 2007 03:39 PM EST



ST. PAUL, Minn. — Pigeon poop has long sullied downtown St. Paul sidewalks, but the slippery, smelly mess is gaining urgency with the Republican National Convention coming to town next year.



Sticky foam, hawk balloons and nets haven't gotten rid of the birds, so officials have a new plan: stealing pigeon eggs.



After pigeons lay their eggs on rooftop nesting grounds, maintenance workers plan to sneak up through trap doors and grab the next generation before it hatches.



"We'll build them little condos. We'll keep taking the eggs, and they won't have little ones," said Bill Stephenson, the city's animal control supervisor. "Slowly they'll die off."



The scheme has the blessing of the St. Paul Audubon Society. Member Val Cunningham said pigeons aren't native, and their eggs aren't protected. If the plan works, "it would be sweet for the city," Cunningham said.



City officials also considered feeding contraceptives to the pigeons but rejected that idea on fears of also inadvertently sterilizing eagles or hawks.





Powered by ScribeFire.

Monday, April 2, 2007

Government must deal with greenhouse gases: US Supreme Court

The US Supreme Court ruled Monday that the Environmental Protection Agency must consider greenhouse gases as pollutants, in a blow to the White House.


"Because greenhouse gases fit well within the Clean Air Act's capacious
definition of 'air pollutant' we hold that EPA has the statutory
authority to regulate the emission of such gases from new motor
vehicles," the court ruled.

Led by Massachusetts, a dozen
states along with several US cities and environmental groups went to
the courts to determine whether the agency had the authority to
regulate greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide emissions.

"The harms associated with climate change
are serious and well recognized," said judge John Paul Stevens as the
ruling was carried by five votes in favor to four against.

The
Republican administration of US President George W. Bush has fiercely
opposed any imposition of binding greenhouse limits on the nation's
industry.

Environmentalists have alleged that since Bush came
to office in 2001 his administration has ignored and tried to hide
looming evidence of global warming and the key role of human activity in climate change.


As the issue has come to the fore in the US, the White House earlier
this year issued a rare open letter defending Bush's record on climate
change, rejecting criticisms that he has only recently awakened to the
problem.

Monday's ruling was immediately hailed by
environmental campaigners which has been fighting for greater
regulations in a nation which accounts for a quarter of global
greenhouse gas emissions.

"It is a watershed moment in the
fight against global warming," said Josh Dorner, spokesman for the
Sierra Club environmental group.

"This is a total repudiation
of the refusal of the Bush administration to use the authority he has
to meet the challenge posed by global warming.

It also "sends
a clear signal to the market that the future lies not in dirty,
outdated technology of yesterday, but in clean energy solutions of
tomorrow like wind, solar," he added.





Powered by ScribeFire.

The Impact of Logging

Corruption Stains Timber Trade

Forests Destroyed in China's Race to Feed Global Wood-Processing Industry

Washington Post Foreign Service

Sunday, April 1, 2007; Page A01

MYITKYINA, Burma -- The Chinese logging boss set his sights on a thickly forested mountain just inside Burma, aiming to harvest one of the last natural stands of teak on Earth.



He handed a rice sack stuffed with $8,000 worth of Chinese currency to two agents with connections in the Burmese borderlands, the men said in interviews. They used that stash to bribe everyone standing between the teak and China. In came Chinese logging crews. Out went huge logs, over Chinese-built roads.



A railway in northeastern China receives timber from the Russian Far East, where the World Bank says half of all logging is illegal. Ikea products are made here and shipped to the U.S.

A railway in northeastern China receives timber from the Russian Far East, where the World Bank says half of all logging is illegal. Ikea products are made here and shipped to the U.S.



Full Article




Powered by ScribeFire.

Friday, March 30, 2007

Google Goes Back to Pre-Katrina Maps

NEW ORLEANS — Google's popular map portal has replaced
post-Hurricane Katrina satellite imagery with pictures taken before the
storm, leaving locals feeling like they're in a time loop and even
fueling suspicions of a conspiracy.

Scroll across the city and the Mississippi Gulf Coast, and
everything is back to normal: Marinas are filled with boats, bridges
are intact and parks are filled with healthy, full-bodied trees.


"Come on," said an incredulous Ruston Henry, president of the
economic development association in New Orleans' devastated Lower 9th
Ward. "Just put in big bold this: 'Google, don't pull the wool over the
world's eyes. Let the truth shine.'"


Chikai Ohazama, a Google Inc. product manager for satellite imagery,
said the maps now available are the best the company can offer.
Numerous factors decide what goes into the databases, "everything from
resolution, to quality, to when the actual imagery was acquired."


He said he was not sure when the current images replaced views of
the city taken after Katrina struck Aug. 29, 2005, flooding an
estimated 80 percent of New Orleans.


In the images available Thursday, the cranes working to fix the
breach of the 17th Street Canal are gone. Blue tarps that covered
roofless homes are replaced by shingles. Homes wiped off their
foundations are miraculously back in place in the Lower 9th. So, too,
is the historic lighthouse on Lake Pontchartrain.


But in the Lower 9th Ward, the truth isn't as pretty, 19 months after Katrina.


"Everything is missing. The people are missing. Nobody is there," Henry said.


After Katrina, Google's satellite images were in high demand among
exiles and hurricane victims anxious to see whether their homes were
damaged.


The new, virtual Potemkin village is fueling the imagination of
locals frustrated with the slow pace of recovery and what they see as
attempts by political leaders to paint a rosier picture.


Pete Gerica, a fisherman who lives in eastern New Orleans, said he
printed pictures of his waterside homestead from Google to use in his
arguments with insurance adjusters.


"I think a lot of stuff they're doing right now is smoke and mirrors
because tourism is so off," Gerica said. "It might be somebody's weird
spin on things looking better."


Henry also wondered whether Google's motives might be less than pure.


"Is Google part of the conspiracy?" he said. "Why these images of pre-Katrina? Seems mighty curious."


Ceeon Quiett, spokeswoman for Mayor Ray Nagin, said that as far as she knew, the city did not request the map change.


"My first reaction was, that's a bit problematic," she said.


Ohazama, the Google product manager, said he "personally" was not
asked by city or state officials to change the imagery, but he added
that Google gets many requests from users and governments to update and
change its imagery.


Google has become a go-to service for people looking for up-close satellite imagery.


"I use it on a regular basis in my class," said Craig Colten, a
geographer at Louisiana State University who has written extensively on
New Orleans. He called Google's switch "unbelievable."


"I'm sure the mayor is thrilled," he quipped.







Powered by ScribeFire.

Saturday, March 24, 2007

World must pay poorer nations to keep forests:

By Ed Davies



JAKARTA (Reuters) - A major U.N. conference on global warming in December should target setting up a system to pay developing nations such as Indonesia and Brazil to keep their forests, an influential climate change expert said on Friday.



In the short term, up to $15 billion extra a year should be set aside by richer nations to preserve forests, which help soak up carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, Nicholas Stern, author of an acclaimed report published last year, told a forum.



Original Article



powered by performancing firefox

Wednesday, March 21, 2007

Gore Implores Congress to Save Planet

WASHINGTON
(AP)
— Al Gore made an emotional return to Congress Wednesday to plead with
lawmakers to fight global warming with moral courage while revealing nothing
about whether he'll join the 2008 presidential race.

The former vice president is a Democratic favorite for the presidential nomination even
though he says he's not running. Fresh off a triumphant Hollywood appearance in
which his climate-change documentary “An Inconvenient Truth'' won two Oscars,
Gore drew overflow crowds as he testified before House and Senate panels about
a “true planetary emergency.''





powered by performancing firefox

Monday, March 19, 2007

Another report on the effects of climate change

World's Most Important Crops Hit by Global Warming Effects



Global warming over the past quarter century has led to a fall in the yield of some of the most important food crops in the world, according to one of the first scientific studies of how climate change has affected cereal crops.

Rising temperatures between 1981 and 2002 caused a loss in production of wheat, corn and barley that amounted in effect to some 40 million tons a year - equivalent to annual losses of some £2.6bn.

Although these numbers are not large compared to the world-wide production of cereal crops, scientists warned that the findings demonstrated how climate change was already having an impact on the global production of staple foods. "Most people tend to think of climate change as something that will impact the future, but this study shows that warming over the past two decades has already had real effects on global food supply," said Christopher Field of the Carnegie Institution in Stanford, California.



The study, published in the journal Environmental Research Letters, analysed yields of cereals from around the world during a period when average temperatures rose by about 0.7C between 1980 and 2002 - although the rise was even higher in certain crop-growing regions of the world.

By Steve Connor

The Independent UK
Go to Original



Monday 19 March 2007





powered by performancing firefox

Saturday, March 17, 2007

The Great Channel Four Swindle

And let us not forget that we all want to believe them. Wouldn't it be wonderful to believe that the science is unsettled, that all that carbon dioxide that we are pumping into the atmosphere really has no effect, and that we do not have to worry about the future.

It would be entirely possible to put together a similar programme, with a string of credible former academics, to argue that smoking does no cause cancer, that HIV does not cause AIDS, or that black people are less intelligent. However, Channel Four would not dare broadcast the programme and we would not believe them if they did. Is it not a reflection of the deep public ambivalence about climate change that these dissenters are given such a prominent and uncritical showcase and that we are so keen to listen to them?



Make up your own minds from their track records. Here is a little more information on some of the people who appeared on the programme:

Fred Singer. Despite the caption on the programme, Singer has retired from the University of Virginia and has not had a single article accepted for any peer-reviewed scientific journal for 20 years. His main work has been as a hired gun for business interests to undermine scientific research on environmental and health matters. Before turning to climate change denial he has argued that CFCs do not cause ozone depletion and second hand smoke does not cause cancer (more... ). In 1990 he founded "The Science and Environment Policy Project", which aggressively contradicts climate science and has received direct funding from Exxon, Shell, Unocal and ARCO. Exxon is also among the funders ($20,000 in 1998 and 2000)



Patrick Michaels is the most prominent US climate change denier. In the programme he claimed "I've never been paid a nickel by the old and gas companies" which is a curious claim. According to the US journalist Ross Gebspan Michaels has received direct funding from, among others German Coal Mining Association ($49,000), Edison Electric Institute ($15,000), and the Western Fuels Association ($63,000) an association of US coal producing interests. The WFA is one of the most powerful forces in the US actively denying the basic science of climate change, funding, amongs other things, the Greening Earth Society which is directed by Patrick Michaels. Tom Wigley, one of the leading IPCC scientists, describes Michaels work as "a catalog of misrepresentation and misinterpretation". (More on Michaels...)



Philip Stott was captioned as a Professor at the University of London although he is retired and is therefore free of any academic accountability. Stott is a geographer by training and has no qualifications in climate science. Since retiring Stott has aimed to become Britain's leading anti-green pundit dedicating himself to wittily criticizing rainforest campaigns (with Patrick Moore), advocating genetic engineering and claiming that "global warming is the new fundamentalist religion."



Patrick Moore is Stott's Canadian equivalent. Since a very personal and painful falling out with Greenpeace in 1986 Moore has put his considerable campaigning energies into undermining environmentalists, especially his former friends and colleagues. Typical of his rhetoric was his claim in the programme that environmentalists were "anti-human" and "treat humans as scum". Throughout the 1990s Moore worked as lead consultant for the British Columbian Timber Products Association undermining Greenpeace's international campaign to protect old growth forest there. Whenever he has the chance he also makes strong public statements in favour of genetic engineering, nuclear power, logging the Amazon, and industrial fishing- all, strangely, lead campaigns for Greenpeace (more on Moore..)



Piers Corbyn has no academic status and his role in such programmes is to promote his own weather prediction business. He has steadfastly refused to ever subject his climatological theories to any form of external review or scrutiny.

Richard Lindzen. As a Professor of Meteorology at the credible Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Lindzen is by far the most reputable academic among the US climate deniers and, for this reason, he is heavily cited by sympathetic journalists such as Melanie Phillips and Michael Crichton. His arguments though are identical to the other deniers – for example an article in the Wall Street Journal (June 11 2001) he claims that "there is no consensus, unanimous or otherwise, about long-term climate trends or what causes them".
He is strongly associated with the other people on the programme though co-authored reports, articles, conference appearances and co-signed statements.

Tim Ball was captioned as the University of Winnipeg. In fact he left in 1996 since when he has run political campaigns through two organisations he helped found: the Natural Resources Stewardship Project and the Friends of Science which, according to their websites aim to run "a proactive grassroots campaign to counter the Kyoto Protocol"; and "encourage and assist the Canadian Federal Government to re-evaluate the Kyoto Protocol". Ian Clark is also on the board of the NRSP.



powered by performancing firefox

Friday, March 16, 2007

Collapse of Arctic Sea Ice "Has Reached Tipping Point"

By Steve Connor Science Editor

The Independent

Friday 16 March 2007

A catastrophic collapse of the Arctic sea ice could lead to radical climate changes in the northern hemisphere according to scientists who warn that the rapid melting is at a "tipping point" beyond which it may not recover.

MORE





powered by performancing firefox